Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼öÀÛ¾÷°ú CAD-CAM¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Á¦ÀÛµÈ 3-unit ºê¸®Áö ¿Î½º ÆÐÅÏÀÇ ÀûÇÕµµ ºñ±³

Comparative Fit of 3-unit Bridge Wax Patterns Fabricated by Manual and CAD-CAM Techniques

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±âÀçÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 37±Ç 4È£ p.305 ~ 312
±è½Ãö, ¹èÁö¿µ, ÀÌÇØÇü,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è½Ãö ( Kim Si-Chul ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ »ýüÀç·áÇб³½Ç
¹èÁö¿µ ( Bae Ji-Young ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ »ýüÀç·áÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÇØÇü ( Lee Hae-Hyoung ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ »ýüÀç·áÇб³½Ç

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal and internal fit of 3-unit bridge wax patterns fabricated
by manual wax-up or CAD-CAM techniques. A three-unit bridge model was prepared with die stone and
two types of margin, knife and chamfer were applied to the abutment teeth. The fit of wax patterns was measured
from mesiodistally sectioned of bridge model with wax patten by microscopic examination. Gap dimensions of
wax patterns prepared in this study were <100 §­, which were within clinically acceptable level, except for occlusal
gap of CAD-CAM wax pattern. Wax patters with knife margin produced better adaption accuracy than does
those with chamfer margin. Axial gap adaption was very good regardless of margin type. Overall, the level of accuracy
of wax pattern produced by manual technique was better than that of CAD-CAM technique.

Å°¿öµå

Fit; Wax pattern; Manual wax-up; CAD-CAM; Bridge

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI